Journal Article Details
Citation:
Chun, J.; Lombardi, A.R.; Rifenbark, G.G.; Brinck, E.A.; Marshall, G.L.; Xu, C.; & Tansey, T.N. (2026). Returning to Move Forward: Service Patterns and Employment Outcomes among Vocational Rehabilitation Returners.
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 64
(2),
115-125.
Title:
Returning to Move Forward: Service Patterns and Employment Outcomes among Vocational Rehabilitation Returners
Authors:
Chun, J.; Lombardi, A.R.; Rifenbark, G.G.; Brinck, E.A.; Marshall, G.L.; Xu, C.; & Tansey, T.N.
Year:
2026
Journal/Publication:
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Publisher:
Sage Journals
DOI:
Full text:
Peer-reviewed?
Yes
NIDILRR-funded?
No
Structured abstract:
Background:
Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Returners are individuals who receive services, have their case closed, and later return for additional services. This understudied group is critical for improving service delivery and resource allocation.
Purpose:
We examined demographic and case factors predicting return to VR services, compared employment outcomes between returners and one-time consumers, and identified VR services linked to competitive employment outcomes.
Data collection & analysis:
Using Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA-911) data (2017–2024), we identified 110,061 returners (6.8%). Logistic regression models examined predictors of return and service types associated with competitive employment; linear regression models compared continuous employment outcomes (weekly hours and wages) between returners and one-time consumers.
Findings:
Individuals receiving public benefits showed higher return rates, with benefit receipt accounting for initial racial disparities. Black and American Indian individuals were more likely to receive benefits; Hispanic individuals less likely. Returners achieved higher employment rates but worked fewer hours at lower wages. Job Placement Assistance and Diagnosis and Treatment were positively associated with employment outcomes.
Conclusions:
VR return patterns reflect intersections of benefit receipt, disability characteristics, and structural constraints. Returners’ higher employment rates but lower wages and hours suggest strategic workforce participation, highlighting the need for longitudinal, career pathway approaches in VR service delivery.